Swimming Upstream

I can think of a dozen name brands I gotten hooked on for years, only to see them suddenly disappear from the shelves, never to return. Breakfast cereals. Hair spray. Cars. And what do we do when this happens? Simply find another brand and get used to it – easy-peasy. But when your streaming television service drops an essential channel, you can’t just jump to the next provider. Try that and you’ll hit your head on the cage they have you securely locked into.

Even if you’re not a sports fan, you’re probably tuned into my topic today.  YouTube TV – which provides me the five channels of streaming television I care about (and 95 forgettable others), dropped ESPN from its lineup.  It wasn’t like they warned us months ago they were renegotiating with Disney (ESPN’s parent), and that these talks weren’t going so well.  Instead they alerted us last Thursday just before midnight – with an email coyly titled “An update on our partnership with Disney”.  Then, the following morning, ESPN was gone.  On Halloween.  How fitting.

Without going into the weeds on why ESPN was dropped, let’s just call it the proverbial contract dispute.  Disney wants one number.  YouTube TV wants another.  A stalemate akin to what we’re seeing in Washington right now.  Yes, what D.C. is blocking is so much more important than a television sports channel.  But when you’re a die-hard college football fan you can relate to losing an “essential service”.

Getting my ESPN back is not like choosing another breakfast cereal.  If only it were that easy.  Instead, we have to shift to an entirely different grocery aisle.  Make that an entirely different supermarket.  As soon as YouTube TV dropped ESPN, Disney was only too happy to promote its own streaming service.  Sign up for Disney+, including ESPN and Hulu!!!  Only $29.95 per month – a savings of $5/month!!!  Only twelve months of subscription required!!!

All those exclamation points are a ruse, as if this is a service I can’t live without.  Disney Channel?  Not my thing.  Hulu?  I’m already getting enough entertainment on Netflix.  I just want ESPN please.  And apparently I should be happy to pay a minimum of $360 for it, in addition to my monthly $80 for YouTube TV.

Bless our tech-savvy children.  We turn to them for all things electronic.  I checked in with one of my sons – who is every bit the college football fanatic I am – and he came to my rescue.  Fubo – a streaming service looking like a twin to YouTube TV – offers a free one-week trial that includes ESPN.  It’s kind of like Congress signing a stopgap spending bill to keep the government open.  Now I have another seven days to figure out what to do.

YouTube TV promises a credit if the lack of negotiations with Disney continues long enough (sorry, the same does not apply to our government).  But I can’t necessarily wait for that credit.  In one week I’ve got to decide if I’m a YouTube TV guy or a Fubo one.  Can’t have both (at least, according to my budget).

Of course, it feels almost inevitable that Fubo will run into a contract dispute with Disney as well.  So even if I go that route I could lose ESPN again.  Maybe I’m getting forced into a Disney+ subscription after all?  But another $360/year?  No way.  I’d sooner get on a plane and go watch my college football games in person.  Er, assuming the FAA doesn’t cancel my flights.  Swimming upstream indeed.  Sigh…

—————-

LEGO Trevi Fountain – Update #3

(Read about the start of this build in Brick Wall Waterfall)

We resumed our fountain build this week with more confidence than the last, accompanied by the merriment of Paganini’s Violin Concerto No. 1.  Bags 6 and 7 – of 15 bags of pieces – were filled with tiny, tiny finger-numbing LEGOs, and at times I wondered just what the heck I was putting together.  Didn’t look like the makings of a fountain to me.

Tiny, tiny!

According to LEGO, water is white and blue.  I suppose the white is meant to be rushing water (as in “waterfall”) while the blue is calm water (as in “pool”).  We shall see.  But check out the look of the fountain in the final photo.  Anyone else see a monster’s mouth with white teeth?

Strange creations

Since this is my fifth LEGO model, it’s high time I make the following proclamation:  LEGO never leaves out a piece.  Never.  I still have moments where I’m searching through a pile of pieces in vain for the one I need.  I almost get to the feeling of “it’s not here”.  But suddenly there the little guy is, staring up at me as if to say, “What took you so long?”  Some day I’d love to see how LEGO pulls this off.  Thousands of pieces in every box, not a single one of them left out.  That’s some logistical magic going on there.

I’m proud to say I made zero mistakes on the build this time around, a dramatic improvement from a week ago.  Okay, that’s not entirely accurate.  I left a piece off the back of the fountain, but immediately discovered my error when I added a section and realized there was nothing to support it.  Fixed in a jiffy, but the merry instruments on Paganini’s violin concerto sounded even more gleeful as they saw my confidence take a hit.

Running build time: 2 hrs. 27 min.

Total leftover pieces: 13

Soft Spots

ESPN broadcast college football’s national championship Monday night. As the game moved to lopsided late in the second quarter my mind drifted to details besides the football itself. Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, FL is a striking facility, especially at night from the vantage point of the Goodyear Blimp. 15,000 football fans spaced randomly into 65,000 seats (thanks, COVID) looks awfully sparse. And speaking of awful(ly), the television commercials… well, let’s just agree college football ain’t the same thing as the Super Bowl, folks.

Home of the NFL’s Miami Dolphins

Super Bowl commercials are more entertaining than the game itself, unlike the advertisement drivel I saw Monday night.  Super Bowl plugs cost $5 million for thirty seconds while Monday night’s spots were six figures at best.  Finally, Super Bowl ads are desperate to be memorable (even if you can’t remember the product itself), which is why you have office pools for “best commercial”.  You’re not gonna have an office pool for what I watched on Monday night.  This was the reverse of the Super Bowl: great football, lousy commercials.

To say Monday night’s commercials paled in comparison to Super Bowl ads is like saying Sprite’s a little clearer than Coke.  These product pushes were awful.  For starters, you had what seemed like five advertisers over a four-hour broadcast.  Dos Equis showed up every fifteen minutes.  Their beer (excuse me, their lager) ads included a closeup of a glassful, with a commentator calling the movement of the bubbles as if they were players on a football field.  Really?  I hope his was a big paycheck.

Then you had AT&T, who seems to be promoting the lovely Milana Vayntrub (as salesperson “Lily”) as much as their products.  Perhaps they’ve watched too many Progressive Insurance ads with Stephanie Courtney (as salesperson “Flo”)?

Don’t recognize Milana? You will soon…

Finally, ESPN promoted itself.  Normally I’d harp on the host network for advertising some of its own programs even though they paid millions to broadcast the game.  But part of me thinks ESPN really does need the promos.  COVID took a big bite out of sports over the last year, as well as a big bite out of ESPN’s workforce.  When the network brought us Korean baseball and American cornhole competitions I thought, “Okay, the end is near”.

But forget ESPN because I need to be a Davey-downer (i.e., slam) on one more commercial.  I’ve been building to this moment since the first paragraph.  Gatorade just launched it’s first new beverage in twenty years: “Bolt24”.  It’s low-cal and loaded with electrolytes, so naturally the target audience is athletes.  And Gatorade also selected athletes to push its product.  Enter Serena Williams.  She’s one of those athletes I’m on the fence about.  Her athletic skills and accomplishments on the tennis court are unquestionable.  She’s garnered enough championships to earn her place in the tennis player “GOAT” discussion (greatest of all time).

But Serena also has her not-so-role-model moments.  She does not take losing well.  She does not welcome constructive criticism.  Countless broken rackets, lectures (threats?) to chair umpires, and disqualifications would have you wondering if there isn’t a permanent child lurking within the adult.  Wah wah wah.  But the Bolt24 ad was the last straw in my Serena drink.  Why?  Because the tagline goes, “you know you’ve made it when the whole world knows you by one name”.  Oh, so when I say just “Serena advertises Bolt 24”, you knowingly say in response, “oh, her?”

https://youtu.be/9n2SXqYyXg0

Yeah, I get the pitch.  Bolt24 is a one-word drink.  Serena Williams is almost the only Serena I can think of (besides Serena van der Woodsen, the entitled main character of the TV series Gossip Girl).  But I just can’t buy into the loftiness of the catchphrase.  Get the world to recognize you by first name only and “you’ve made it”?  Sting. Madonna. Cher. Bono. Enya.  See the pattern?  It’s an actor/singer thing.  Also, an athlete thing.  Lebron. Tiger. O.J. (Maybe that last one should just be “Juice”?)

Okay then, shutting down my rant now.  Holier-than-thou personas don’t deserve any more press.  I like to keep “Life in a Word” positive; simple; modest.  Like me.  You know… Dave.

Some content sourced from Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.