Adventures in Library-ing

Early each calendar year I look back on the previous year’s expenses to discover areas in the family budget where I can trim. The price of food, gasoline, and other “have-to-have’s” always seems to go up, so I search for items that are not so “have-to-have” to balance things out. A good example is books. I read two or three a month on my Kindle e-Reader. At say, $14.99 a pop that’d be over $500 I could carve out of annual expenses… if I could only get those same books at no cost. But where-oh-where could I possibly find books for free?

You bibliophiles out there (and the rest of you, for that matter) are laughing as I’m about to describe going to the library as an adventure, but here’s the thing.  I’ve been e-reading on my Amazon Kindle for so long that the idea of holding a book and turning its pages – let alone checking one out of a library – has become, well, novel again.

I wouldn’t have reached this crossroads were it not for a particular book.  Amazon described Frank Delaney’s The Matchmaker of Kenmare just the way I’d hope: an intriguing WWII-era work of fiction.  So I went to “try a sample”(where Amazon allows you the first several pages of the book for free) and – horror of horrors – it’s not available in digital format.  WHAT?  No e-Version?  You’re saying, Amazon, I have to shell out $24.99 for the hard copy if I want to read it?

A book for $10 doesn’t make me pause but one for $25 sure does.  Hence began my library adventure.  The last time I spent meaningful time in one was in college (and I don’t want to tell you how long ago that was).  The library experience is probably different in every way now, starting online. When I “checked out” my library’s website (ha) I discovered I could get a digital library card almost immediately.  With the digital card I could reserve and check out books from the comfort of my home computer.  Hurrah, free books here I come!

Oh how I wish it were that easy.  Turns out, my library’s software is not compatible with an Amazon Kindle.  No digital books for me, sigh.  And besides, physical books – like the one I wanted – require a physical library card.  So with no other excuse to avoid it, I got in my car and headed off to my local branch.  Guess what?  Parking at the library is free.  Entering the building itself is free (no cover charge!).  Getting a library card is free.  Even the library bathrooms can be used without having to check out a book first.

Our main (and modern) library branch

Yes, this is my tax dollars at work of course, but the illusion of all this free stuff is fun while it lasts.  And boy howdy, libraries aren’t what they used to be.  Ours has all these rooms and services and people, as if the surrounding shelves of books are merely a carry-over from past generations.  You can sit down to public-access computers, attend a lecture, host a meeting, rent DVDs, buy coffee, and even spend time in a room of books dedicated to the history of the surrounding county.  Maybe this is all review for you, but it’s a little overwhelming for an e-reader who’s navigating libraries of the new world.

Our secondary (and ancient) library branch

There’s more to this adventure in library-ing than I have time for today (including the over-the-river and through-the woods visit to a different and decidedly ancient branch in my library’s network), but let’s close the book on this topic with a “laugh’s on me” conclusion.  As I was researching for this blog post I went to the Amazon page for my Matchmaker… novel again.  Go figure; it’s available in digital format after all, and even in paperback.  How did I miss these options the first time around?  Must be the library gods telling me to go old-school and get a physical copy for free.


LEGO Notre-Dame de Paris – Update #4

(Read about the start of this “church service” in Highest Chair)

Click the photo for a more detailed view

As Notre-Dame de Paris rises slowly from its foundations, I often picture a congregation of parishioners down there at ground level, sitting quietly in the pews.  Startled by the snap of a LEGO block above them, they gaze skyward, see my giant fingers, and wonder, “OMG is that the hand of God?”  No, no, little ones, it’s just Dave, working through Bag 7… of 34 bags of pieces.

The little devil was still in the bag

Today almost included the long-awaited moment where I realize with mock horror that LEGO left a piece out of one of their model sets.  I churned through my piles of pieces, endlessly stirring and turning them over and over, but to no avail.  A piece was missing, and that sick-to-your-stomach feeling settled in deep, the way you reach the end of a jigsaw puzzle minus one piece.  Then, to my utter amazement, I spied it out of the corner of my eye.  The tiny traitor was still in Bag 7.  Wow.  Good thing that plastic bag wasn’t already relegated to the trash, huh?

“Underfed” buttresses

On the other hand, with more excitement than it probably deserved, today we began construction of Notre-Dame’s signature flying buttresses.  At first I was disappointed in the LEGO pieces, because I thought they looked a little, well, “underfed”.  Then I remembered; we’re only beginning the structure of the buttresses.  The finished look you see on the outside of Notre-Dame is supported by a complex of arches and columns well below it.  Here I thought my “God’s hand” was already working at roof level but in fact, we’re only about halfway up the structure.

Running build time: 3 hrs. 32 min.

Total leftover pieces: 16

Mind Your Mannerisms!

My late father had a habit I always admired. He’d send personal notes of thanks to those he felt deserved his gratitude. His notes were not smartphone texts, emails, or Word documents. They were handwritten sentiments on heavy card stock, his name elegantly embossed across the top. Why did these notes capture my admiration? Because I’ve forgotten how to write them myself.  Or more to the point, I’ve forgotten how to write.

America’s Common Core Standards – the guidelines by which most states create curriculums for school grades 1-12 – no longer include cursive writing.  Students still learn to write block letters, but the flowing, looping mannerism of cursive has pretty much been left behind.  Instead, typing is more Common Core, and probably taught in a grade much sooner than my own middle school years.  Frankly, the only remaining argument in favor of cursive writing might be for the signature of one’s name.

Autopen

Even handwritten signatures have fallen by the wayside.  Ever heard of an Autopen?  It’s a mechanical hand, designed to hold a pen and duplicate one’s signature over and over.  The Autopen is popular with politicians who want their handwritten signature on countless memos and letters, but without the added task of actually signing them.

I have a sort of Autopen myself but it’s more of a stamp.  I sent my handwritten signature to a company and a few weeks later I received a stamp in return.  When used with just the right amount of pressure it’s the spittin’ image of the one I’d sign with my own hand.  It’s something of a writing “crutch”.

The hard truth is, over the years my cursive has devolved from “Dave, you have beautiful handwriting” to “Uh, what is that supposed to say?”  I can’t even read my own writing anymore.  To add to this misery my hands shake a little, which means my formerly elegant loops and curls are now jiggly, scribbly lines.  Filling out the tip, the total, and the signature on a restaurant receipt is now a legitimate challenge in legibility.

It didn’t occur to me until recently that my illegible handwriting is simply the product of no longer writing by hand.  I’ve always believed this degradation was the result of aging fingers, hands, and the associated muscles required for cursive writing.  To a certain extent this is true.  But more importantly, my writing muscles just don’t remember what to do anymore.

Beginning of the end of cursive

The first day I walked into typing class was likely the first day my cursive writing went downhill.  The manual typewriter, followed by the electric typewriter, followed years later by the computer keyboard ensured I could create quick and perfectly legible documents in myriad fonts.  Cursive writers average only 13 words a minute.  Typists?  40, 60, sometimes as many as 80 words a minute.

But the pursuit of writing efficiency comes at a somewhat alarming cost.  You lose the connection between mind and matter.  Cursive writing is slow-w-w, which translates to more focus on what you are writing about as you form the letters.  Typing feels more like a sprint to the finish, to get your thoughts through the keyboard as quickly as possible.  Think of cursive as “in your own words”, while typing is “verbatim”.

Here’s an interesting experiment for you bloggers to consider.  Write your next post in cursive before you take to the keyboard.  See if your “voice” doesn’t sound a little more thoughtful than the one from the keyboard.  Now here’s an experiment for me.  What if I were to spend ten minutes a day trying to restore my handwriting?  Would it eventually be described as “beautiful” once again?

Side note: I’ve somehow retained the dexterity of playing the piano, even though I don’t sit down to the keyboard very often.  I’ve noticed my fingers hover over the piano the same way they do over the computer keyboard.  Maybe this is muscle memory at work, no matter what the fingers are doing?

Someday it wouldn’t surprise me to see a famous quote, penned in beautiful flowing cursive, framed and displayed as artwork in a museum.  The piece would bring us back to simpler days, back to the times when a physical hand put deep thoughts on physical paper.  Of course, the question then would be, will anybody still be able to read cursive?


LEGO Notre-Dame de Paris – Update #3

(Read about the start of this “church service” in Highest Chair)

Click the photo for a more detailed view

There were moments in the build today where I would’ve preferred to be laboring on the real cathedral.  Bags 4, 5, and 6 – of 34 bags of pieces – were loaded with some of the tiniest pieces I’ve ever seen in a LEGO set.  As I spilled out one of the bags a determined little square tile dashed away to the deep, dark recesses underneath my desk.  If it weren’t for my phone’s flashlight I might never have rescued him.

The east end of the sanctuary (and altar beyond)

We built a lot of round, structural columns today.  I’ve never seen a step in a LEGO instruction manual asking for 48 identical pieces, but there I was, stacking them in my hand as I counted, “33, 34, 35…”.  Those 48 pieces assembled to the 24 columns you kind-of sort-of see here.

The altar from above (before this is all covered up!)

We also reinforced, filled in, and rose to new heights the curving east end of the cathedral.  This assembly brought new levels of frustration, in that the installation of some pieces caused others to promptly dislodge.  Indeed, at one point a very tiny piece skittered onto the floor of the cathedral (hidden within those 24 columns) and the only way to get him out was to rock the whole assembly back and forth in my hands the way you would a marble maze.

I spy an upside-down LEGO logo 😦

I need to do a better job of taking photos as I build, because the fruits of my labor are already being covered up by the higher structure of the cathedral.  Maybe it was no different with the artisans of the real Notre-Dame de Paris, who crafted in very small spaces knowing almost no one would ever see the detail of their work.  At least I have a camera.  Back then they’d have to make a painting of what they created just to show off their accomplishments!

Running build time: 2 hrs. 50 min.

Total leftover pieces: 11 (!)

Some content sourced from The Guardian article, “Signature moves: are we losing the ability to write by hand?”

Pride, Pomp, and Circumstance

I managed to get through high school literature class without having to wrestle with Shakespeare, not even once. To me, Romeo and Juliet are simply characters from a movie I’ve never seen. Hamlet is another name for a small village. Othello is a board game I played as a teenager. But hey, maybe I should be a fan of Shakespeare. After all, he gets the credit for penning the phrase “pomp and circumstance”.

It’s true – “Pride, pomp, and circumstance (of glorious war!)” is a line from Shakespeare’s play Othello, written way back in 1603.  Somewhere in the hundreds of years since, “Pomp and circumstance” became the name of the musical march we all associate with graduation ceremonies.  But for today’s purposes, pomp and circumstance (or “P&C” if you will) means “formal and impressive ceremonies or activities”.  And Monday’s presidential inauguration ceremony was the perfect example of that.

I am a big fan of American P&C.  Without it the inauguration ceremony would’ve been nothing but mundane repeat-after-me oaths.  With it you get your heart fill-er-upped with pride.  Monday’s ceremony was replete with red, white, and blue decor.  American flags were everywhere.  The guests of honor were escorted to their seats by men and women in splendid uniforms.  The cannons nearby boomed over and over when the oaths were completed.  And for my American dollars, nothing says pomp and circumstance like those patriotic anthems.

U.S. Naval Academy Glee Club

Having spent most of my years in Colorado Springs, “America the Beautiful” is close to my heart because its lyrics were born from the top of nearby Pikes Peak.  All credit to Carrie Underwood for her performance of its first verse on Monday, enduring technical difficulties to sing a cappella.  Then there was the charismatic Rev. Lorenzo Sewell, embellishing his prayer of gratitude with the opening lines of “My Country Tis of Thee”.   And you’d be forgiven for shedding a tear during the soaring “Battle Hymn of the Republic”, belted out by the men and women of the U.S. Naval Academy Glee Club (and earning a standing ovation).

Macchio

But I’m forgetting one more anthem.  Or should I say, I can’t forget the one more.  Yes, Christopher Dean Macchio (“America’s tenor”) sang “The Star Spangled Banner” to close out the inauguration ceremony, but he also performed another anthem to kick things off and I’m still humming it today.  Why, I ask myself, have I never heard “O, America” before?

“O, America” – go figure – was written by an Irishman.  Brendan Graham penned the lyrics into a big hit for the group “Celtic Woman”.  You’d think the words would be from the perspective of someone overseas but “O, America” is clearly about someone here… and someone now.  Have a listen and I think you’ll agree.  In the words of Othello, “O, America” is all about “pride, pomp, and circumstance”.  This week I am filled with all three.


LEGO Notre-Dame de Paris – Update #2

(read about the start of this “church service” in Highest Chair)

I’m glad I remembered my antiperspirant today.  Bags 2 and 3 – of 34 bags of pieces – encouraged sweat, tested patience, and made me realize my fingers are anything but nimble.   My hands are still shaking after the hour and change it took to build this section.

We started by tiling the cathedral floor.  Look closely – those black and white pieces aren’t all the same shape or orientation.  I installed one wrong and almost needed pliers to get it back out.  Imagine if you made the same mistake on the floor of the real Notre-Dame.  You’d get fired for wasting priceless marble!

Having said that, the floor was just a warm up for the colonnade that now rises up around the altar.  It is made from tiny, tiny pieces!  I think LEGO should invent special gloves that a) allow you to easily grasp these little guys while b) protecting your fingers from their sharp edges.  Pressing them into place again and again can be painful!  Those beige column supports you see on the tile floor left little round dents in my fingertips.

Finally, notice the repetitive structure of the colonnade, like a circle of rocket ships ready to launch.  LEGO shows you how to build one of these vertical elements (each one is about twenty pieces) and then goes, “Okay Dave, do that fourteen more times”.  The Grand Piano was also tough but I wouldn’t say it was repetitive.  Notre-Dame de Paris has found a new way to test my patience.

Running build time: 1 hour 37 min.

Total leftover pieces: 5

Some content sourced from the Irish Central article, “Irishman’s song ‘O America’ performed at Trump’s inauguration”, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

See You In (my) Church

When I went to Sunday school many, many years ago, they taught us the little ditty “Here Is The Church” (… here is the steeple, open the doors and see all the people). You’d make a church with your hands pressed together as you sang, raising the steeple by extending and touching the tips of your pointer fingers. Today, sixty-odd years later, those same hands will build a cathedral – Notre-Dame de Paris. Granted my church is made from LEGO blocks and the entire model will be smaller than a cornerstone of the real Notre-Dame, but at least the steeple is made from more than fingers.

So then, “Here Is The Cathedral”… in its purchased form. The cardboard box you see is not what I would call huge, but it’s an ample residence for 4,383 plastic pieces. These pieces dwell in thirty-four separate plastic bag communities, just begging to be liberated.  Buried underneath all these subdivisions (in the crypt, if you will) is the brick of an instruction manual, a veritable phone book of almost 300 pages. C’mon, you didn’t think we’d raise this cathedral in a single blog post, did you?

Mr. Instruction Manual could be called the mayor of this manufactured mess. He guides me on who gets together with who, when they get together, how they get together, and what it’s all supposed to look like as I go.  Mr. Manual has pages and pages of impressive illustrations (like this one), but also some LOL ones (like the one below). I mean, check out the upper left corner.  Am I really supposed to vigorously shake the bag out like that? The tiny residents will go running in all directions! We’re trying to create order from chaos here, people, not the other way around.

I expect all of the same challenges I encountered when I built the LEGO Grand Piano. I’ll think pieces are missing until somehow they appear right in front of me. I’ll connect pieces incorrectly and have to backtrack several steps to get them right. I’ll be left with extra pieces every now and then, and forever wonder if they were really “extra” or perhaps “overlooked”.  And I’ll police plastic piles around the meager real estate of my home office desk.  Maybe I require a shepherd’s crook or a bullhorn?  I mean, it’s me versus 4,383 others so you can see how one or two of them are bound to escape.

Here’s a thoughtful aspect of LEGO Notre-Dame de Paris, and oh-so appealing to the architect in me. The model will be built in the same chronological order as the original was (instead of, say, from the ground up). The first twenty years of Notre-Dame’s construction produced only the rounded east end you see here, which served by itself as a functioning church. The next twenty years generated the full footprint but without the roof, towers, and other noteworthy exterior elements.  The final sixty years brought everything across the finish line.  So I’ll be building the LEGO model in the same order, only in a hundred days (or less) instead of a hundred years.

10,000 piece tower

Before I snap Piece 1 onto Piece 2, let me dress down my many thousands of new plastic friends.  Together they comprise nowhere near the largest of the LEGO sets.  A model of Harry Potter’s Hogwarts Castle is over 6,000 pieces.  The LEGO Star Wars Millennium Falcon is over 7,500 pieces.  LEGO Titanic (er, before it sank): 9,000 pieces.  And standing regally at the top of the LEGO podium (and just a twenty-minute bus ride from Notre-Dame de Paris): the Eiffel Tower, the only LEGO model to exceed 10,000 pieces.  To each of these top-tens I say non.  Notre-Dame will be challenge enough for this builder/blogger.

LEGO Notre-Dame de Paris – Update #1

Now that we’ve had the prelude (so to speak) it’s time for the church service to begin!  Bag #1 – of 34 bags of pieces – houses the first 100 or so of the little guys.  LEGO thoughtfully opted for a sub-community in Bag #1 for the tiniest of residents (some of which are just begging for tweezers).

chaos

Mr. Instruction Manual (who is multilingual by the way; he speaks English, French, and Spanish), warns me to “… avoid danger of suffocation by keeping this bag away from babies and children!”  Mr. Manual also wants me to know my thousand of pieces were manufactured in five different countries: Denmark (of course), Mexico, Hungary, China, and the Czech Republic.

danger

It’s fair to say I haven’t stood in the LEGO “pulpit” for awhile.  I snapped pieces together incorrectly at least three times today.  I also thought I was missing pieces twice, and I fretted over the fact I ended up with two leftovers.  Let’s hope our church service is smoother next week!  In the meantime, here is the build of Bag #1.  Not much to look at but at least it’s the foundation of the east end of the Cathedral.  In 1163 Pope Alexander III oversaw the first stone being set in place.  In 2025 nobody saw me do the same.

order

Bag #: 1

Running build time: 25:38

Total leftover pieces: 2

Highest Chair

When we babysit our granddaughters here at the house, we tap into several items to make the job easier. A big basket of toys and stuffed animals sits in the corner of our living room. A dozen children’s books line the lowest shelf just waiting to tell their stories. Sesame Street is easily streamed on the nearby television. And at dinner time we roll out the high chair so everyone’s on the same level. So who would’ve thought a high chair would be my blog topic for today? Maybe you, if you know anything about cathedrals.

Notre-Dame de Paris

We’re almost there, loyal readers.  I will lay the corner-block of my LEGO model of Notre-Dame de Paris next week.  Why not this week, you ask?  Because before we crack the seal on the giant box of pieces, we need to pay a little respect to the real Cathedral.  I want you to know a few things about the stone and glass Notre-Dame before you witness the rising of the plastic one.

West facade

It’s a cathedral in the middle of Paris, Dave… what more do I need to know?  Uh, a LOT more.  To begin with, do you even know what a cathedral is?  I didn’t (and I have a background in architecture, for gosh sake).  It’s a big, giant church with stained glass and chapels and a raised altar, you say.  Well yes, you’re right, but what makes a church a cathedral?  Interestingly, it has nothing to do with the building itself.  Instead, a cathedral is the seat of a bishop (the ordained clergy-person who presides over the surrounding parishes). For lack of a church this person could just as easily be in a small house and it would still be considered a cathedral.

Cathedrals really do have “high chairs” on their altars for the bishops (cathedra in Latin means “seat”) but Notre-Dame de Paris is much more than a place for furniture.  First and foremost, it took a hundred years to construct (1163-1260).  In that era the building evolved from the common Romanesque style of the period to the more elegant French Gothic.  Notre-Dame feels unusually vertical and airy for a structure of its time and there’s a novel reason for this: flying buttresses.

Flying buttresses

Imagine Notre-Dame’s architect – Eugène Viollet-le-Duc – talking to the Paris city council in the twelfth century and saying, “Look guys, let’s think outside the box here… literally.  The structural support for this church ought to be outside of the building instead of inside”.  Why would the architect want this?  Because the flying buttresses assume the structural load that was previously handled by short, thick interior walls.  The result is taller, more dramatic spaces, filled with the light of high-up stained glass windows.  In other words, flying buttresses allow Notre-Dame to “reach for the heavens” much better than its Romanesque predecessors.

North rose window

There’s also more to this French “grande dame” than structure, of course.  Notre-Dame has twenty-nine chapels surrounding the main sanctuary (that’s gonna take a lot of LEGO).  It features three spectacular stained glass “rose” windows that would not be as large or as high were it not for those flying buttresses.  Notre-Dame’s twin towers host ten massive bronze bells and they each have first names.  “Emmanuel” (listen to his sound bite below) and “Marie” are so big they take up the entire south tower, while their eight ringing siblings all fit into the north tower.

Notre-Dame also has a central flèche, a spire not unlike the ones you see on more modest churches.  This spire, however, is topped by a bronze rooster, which is not only the symbol of the French state but also a container for (supposedly) a small piece of the Crown of Thorns, worn by Jesus leading up to his crucifixion.

Rooster-topped “flèche”

As you would expect, Notre-Dame de Paris hosts countless works of art, whether paintings or sculptures.  Many of the sculptures are biblical scenes intended to educate the illiterate parishioners of the twelfth century.  But my favorite sculptures may be those of the twelve apostles, way up high surrounding the base of the flèche and looking outwards towards Paris… all except one.  St. Thomas – patron saint of architects – faces Notre-Dame itself, and was given the facial features of Viollet-le-Duc.

Okay, so now you know more about Notre-Dame de Paris than just the LEGO model.  Considering there are over 500 Gothic cathedrals in Europe, it’s impressive to see Notre-Dame at the very top of at least one “Top Ten Cathedrals” list.  We’ll visit some of those other “high chairs” in future posts, to add even more life to my pile of plastic pieces. In the meantime, my LEGO “church service” begins promptly at 10am next Thursday.

Some content sourced from Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Making An Entrance

My son will complete the purchase of his first house next week. We’ve helped him mull over properties the last few months, scrutinizing everything from floor plans to foundations. But I always focus on whether a house has a formal entry or not. There’s something about a foyer that feels essential to me, as if to say, “Welcome!”.  Apple must’ve felt the same way when they designed their flagship store in New York City. Welcome to Apple Fifth Avenue.

Apple Fifth Avenue

If you’ve been to an Apple Store (and who am I kidding here; we’ve all been to an Apple Store), you know they’re essentially a room of tables and shelves. You’re greeted up front, asked what brings you in, and directed to wherever you need to go. Apple Fifth Avenue, on the other hand, needs no greeters.  Its dramatic foyer beckons you in all by itself.

Apple Fifth Avenue’s entry is a 32 ft. glass cube dropped into the middle of a plaza in downtown Manhattan.  The adjacent skyscrapers make the transparent structure stand out even more.  There’s no signage whatsoever; simply a large, suspended Apple logo inviting you to descend the elevator or elegant spiral staircase to the store itself (which is entirely below ground).  It’s the same strategy employed by the Louvre in Paris, with its above-ground glass pyramid serving as the entrance to the museum’s lobby below.

Plaza skylights and “lenses”

Without this entry I’m not sure Apple Fifth Avenue’s design would garner much attention, yet there are other elements worth noting.  The surrounding plaza is dotted with 62 frosted skylights, bringing welcome natural light to the retail space below.  The plaza also hosts 18 “lenses” – reflective steel shells with glass tops – to give you peeks downstairs.  In the store itself you’ll find several (real) trees, with seating incorporated into their circular planters.

Planters double as seating

Apple Fifth Avenue became so popular a destination that secondary entrances were added (two staircases in the plaza) and the square footage of the store itself was doubled.

One of the more interesting stories behind Apple Fifth Avenue’s design concerned the size of the entry.  CEO Steve Jobs wanted a 40-ft. cube while the property owner insisted on 30.  To bridge the gap, a full-scale mock-up was created and placed in the plaza for Apple executives to see.  The problem: Apple didn’t want to draw the attention of the public any more than they had to.  So the mock-up was installed for just a couple of hours at 2 a.m. on a random weekday.  When a 40-ft. cube was deemed too large (sorry, Steve), it was quickly disassembled to reveal a smaller cube inside – the size of the one you enter today.

It’s about time I included a NYC building in my posts on architecture, wouldn’t you agree?  New Yorkers know I had plenty of choices, like the Empire State Building, Waldorf Astoria Hotel, St. Patrick’s Cathedral, and Grand Central Station.  But those have been around a long time.  Apple Fifth Avenue opened its doors less than twenty years ago, and is already in the top sixty on the list of America’s Favorite Architecture.

As I recall the houses we looked at with my son, some had no foyer whatsoever.  You walked across the threshold and found yourself standing in the front room or living room.  That’s no way to make an entrance, is it?  Apple knows better.  At most of their stores you get a greeter.  At Apple Fifth Avenue you get a full-on welcome. 

Now for the latest on LEGO Fallingwater…

____________________

LEGO Fallingwater – Update #10 (Read how this project got started in Perfect Harmony)

We’ve placed the very last brick into place, closing the assembly manual on our ten-week construction of LEGO Fallingwater.  92 pages (or 100%, or 222 minutes) into the build, here is the final product:

LEGO Fallingwater

The angle of this photo is intended to match the photo above so you can compare the model to the real thing.  I want to label the model “crude” but how about “rudimentary” instead?  The intricacies of LEGO models have come a long way since this one.

A note about missing pieces.  As I worked through the final steps I realized a handful of pieces were missing.  I write this off to a less-than-perfect mechanism doling out the pieces for each model (or was this done by hand?)  The LEGO Grand Piano wasn’t missing a single piece out of 3,000+.  The gaps aren’t obvious at a glance so we can still call Fallingwater complete.  Thanks for coming along for the ride!

Now for one last nod to Frank Lloyd Wright…

Oak Park Home & Studio

It’s fitting to finish where it all began.  Wright’s first design (of which he was the sole architect) was his own home, built just west of Chicago in 1889.

Frank Lloyd Wright Home & Studio, Oak Park, IL

The house’s style, “Seaside Colonial” (borrowing from similar designs on the East Coast) was Wright’s first experiment with the Prairie Style elements that would later come together in so many of his other designs.  The exterior is grounded with brick and stone while the interior has a largely open floor plan.  The barrel-vaulted playroom was built on a smaller scale; a deliberate nod to its young occupants.

Barrel-vaulted playroom

The rapid success of Wright’s architecture practice allowed for the expansion of the house a few years later, including the large octagonal structure you see on the left (for drafting studios, offices, a library, and a reception hall).  Wright wore all the design hats on this project, including the mechanical systems, lighting, furniture, and decor.

Wright’s Oak Park Home & Studio is a National Historic Landmark and is open to the public.  Even better, you can take a walking tour through the nearby neighborhoods to see ten houses he designed that still stand today.

Some content sourced from the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation website, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

All Manor of Reflection

I find music boxes enchanting, especially the small glass cases where you can watch the cylinder spin its tune like a lazy water wheel. It’s as if someone opened the top, held it up to the wind, and captured a simple melody floating by. Maybe this is why I find the concept of a glass church so appealing. Welcome to California’s Crystal Cathedral.

Crystal Cathedral, Garden Grove, CA

Whether or not you liked Phillip Johnson’s Glass House from a couple of posts ago (survey says “not”), you’ll concede he was creative in his use of glass.  The Crystal Cathedral is, by far, his most impressive example.  When it was constructed in 1980, it was immediately dubbed the largest glass church in the world.  By a mile.

Schuller standing in the “cheap seats”

Johnson designed the Cathedral (partnering with architect John Burgee) for Dr. Robert Schuller.  Rev. Schuller was a televangelist in the 1970s, beginning his ministry by preaching to carloads from atop the refreshment stand of a Southern California drive-in theater.  The proceeds of his Sunday morning “Hour of Power” financed the Cathedral, on a property Schuller called a “22-acre shopping center for Jesus Christ”.  As for the building itself, Schuller declared, “If a two-by-four comes between your eyeball and the changing edge of a cloud, something is lost”.  Hence, he demanded a glass church.

The Crystal Cathedral is impressive enough to look at from the surrounding parking lot; a flattened diamond floor plan covered with 10,000 rectangle panels of glued-on mirrored glass.  But walk inside – and believe me, it’s a walk – passing beneath the floating bleachers of pews and choir lofts into the explosion of the sanctuary itself, and you’ll understand why the Cathedral really “shines”.  The space is so vast that – like some of today’s enclosed football stadiums – you’ll swear you’re still outside.

The Crystal Cathedral is a glass music box of sorts.  Its organ is the fifth-largest in the world, with 16,000 pipes.  Its choir numbers into the hundreds of voices.  Needless to say, the church service needs to be grand to satisfy a room of 2,500 parishioners.

As much as I prefer a modest venue for worship, I can appreciate the megachurch approach if it’s done with a modicum of grace.  I’m not sure this is the case with the Crystal Cathedral.  Down the center aisle you’ll find a long reflecting pool, spotted with gushing fountains that suddenly cease when Schuller appears at the pulpit.  A pair of towering “Cape Canaveral” doors behind the altar swing open, so Schuller can give a wave and a prayer to the masses parked outside.  And in a full-on nod to Broadway, the Cathedral’s annual “Glory of Christmas” pageant includes a smoke machine for storm simulations, seven flying angels, and scores of live animals (everything from camels to water buffaloes).  Should this surprise me, in the cavernous glass box of a world-famous televangelist?

The Crystal Cathedral is open to the public… er, if you’re willing to take in a Catholic Mass while you’re at it.  Schuller’s Reformed Church ministry filed for bankruptcy in 2010 (in part because of the overwhelming operating costs of the facility).  Schuller himself died in 2015.  Soon after, the local Catholic diocese purchased the property at a deep discount and renamed it “Christ Cathedral”.  I hope the fountains, spaceship doors, and Broadway shows have taken a break since then.  After all, the building itself is ample reason for reflection.

Now for the latest on LEGO Fallingwater…

____________________

LEGO Fallingwater – Update #9 (Read how this project got started in Perfect Harmony)

We worked off-model again this week, on the house itself, assembling one floor at a time before everything comes together.  80 pages (or 88%, or 203 minutes) into the build, this is what we have:

It’s convenient to halt the construction for this photo, because you can see the individual floors before they’re stacked together and hidden.  The level in the foreground is the bottom story, with the living room in back and smooth decks in front and to the right.  The other level is the middle story, a bedroom with smaller balconies to the left and right.

Next week I’ll assemble the top (and final) level, a “gallery” whose use was as much for the surrounding views as for the interior space.  Then I’ll stack the floors together, insert them into the open space you see to the right of the glass tower, and our Fallingwater model will finally be complete.

Tune in next Thursday as construction continues!  Now for another nod to Frank Lloyd Wright…

Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church

Since we toured a cathedral today, it seems only fitting we acknowledge one of Wright’s handful of religious structures.  Wauwatosa, Wisconsin’s Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church was one of his last designs, not completed until after his death in 1959.  Wright consulted his wife (who was raised in the faith) on its important symbols.  Accordingly, the dome and the Greek cross play significantly in the building design.  The structural arches and pillars reflected on the exterior allow the sanctuary to be an uninterrupted circular space.  The dome is not as you would imagine the interior to be, but rather the cap on an inverted dome, reflecting as a sort of bowl suspended above the sanctuary.

Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church

Lest you think Annunciation Church is a bit of a spaceship, the design intentionally pulls elements from its more famous predecessor, Hagia Sophia mosque in Istanbul, Turkey.  Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church is included on America’s National Register of Historic Places.

Some content sourced from Johnson/Burgee: Architecture, the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation website, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Pandora’s Box

When America’s cities bred lifeless glass-and-steel skyscrapers in the 1960s, an architectural movement was born known as postmodernism. “Postmod” buildings were bold reactions to their dull and repetitive counterparts, using more distinctive materials and brighter colors. Perhaps no better example (or context) exists than in the city government offices of Portland, OR. Welcome to the Portland Building.

Michael Graves’ “Portland Building”

Every structure I’ve covered in my recent posts on architecture lands on the American Institute of Architects’ America’s Favorite Architecture list.  Even Phillip Johnson’s Glass House – the one I have a love/hate relationship with – makes the cut.  But not the Portland Building.  This may be architect Michael Graves’ signature design but it’s also known as “the building we love to hate”.

Take a good look at the Portland Building photo and tell me what comes to mind.  Christmas gift?  Child’s transformer toy?  Strawberry-chocolate cake?  I suggest Pandora’s box.  I studied the Portland Building in college because the construction was completed in 1982, in the third year of my degree.  It was a landmark statement of postmod.  It was also a disaster from the day its doors opened.

Architects don’t always consider the practical aspects of a building, and budgets sometimes compromise on essentials.  As soon as the city’s employees moved in, they realized the tiny windows don’t bring in much natural light, and the lack of adequate ventilation made it something of a hot box.  Of greater concern, the Portland Building ran into water infiltration and structural issues almost immediately.  The building required the first of several remodels only eight years after its construction, even though the city commissioners would’ve preferred it demolished instead.  Like Pandora’s box, the Portland Building seemed to be an endless font of bad news.

“Portlandia”

There’s not much to say about the Portland Building to entice you to visit (not even the rather bizarre 6.5-ton copper female poised menacingly above the entrance).  The building is surrounded by blocks of nondescript skyscrapers, which makes the design all the more jaw-dropping when you see it in person.  The only vote of confidence might’ve come from Portland’s mayor himself when it opened.  He proclaimed the building “Portland’s Eiffel Tower… an emblem of the city which will draw the curious from around the world”.

The “goddess” seems to wonder why you’d even enter the building.

The negative commentary is much more fun.  A columnist from a local paper described the Portland Building as “something designed by a Third World dictator’s mistress’ art-student brother.”  Architect Pietro Belluschi said “it’s not architecture, it’s packaging… and there are only two good things about it: it will put Portland on the map, architecturally, and it will never be repeated.”  Travel + Leisure magazine called it “one of the most hated buildings in America”.  Need I say more?

Fish out of water?

The Portland Building is a case study of noteworthy architecture, yes… but that may be its only upside.  The difference between “attractive” and “atrocious” can be as wide as the Grand Canyon.  There’s value in whether you “like” a building.  There’s also a reason you won’t find many other postmodernist structures in Portland.

Now for the latest on LEGO Fallingwater…

____________________

LEGO Fallingwater – Update #8  (Read how this project got started in Perfect Harmony)

Today the off-model structure finally settled into the base, in a brisk twelve minutes of assembly time.  70 pages (or 77%, or 181 minutes) into the build, this is what we have:

As you can see on the left, the house is starting to rise rather dramatically from the underlying landscape and water.  Check out the photo above to understand the vertical glassed-in area that rises from the bottom of the house all the way to the top.

Boring as the build has been these last few weeks, I realize the underlying structure is necessary to support Fallingwater’s distinctive concrete balconies and stone chimneys.  I also realize I have only two weeks remaining on this project.  No wonder the piles of remaining pieces are dwindling!  And rudimentary as those pieces may be, I expect the last two chapters to really bring the house into its fullest presentation.

Tune in next Thursday as construction continues!  Now for another nod to Frank Lloyd Wright…

Taliesin West

Most of Wright’s life (and designs) took place in America’s Midwest, but at some point the architect visited Arizona and later created the winter getaway he described as his “desert utopia”.  Taliesin West is a campus of buildings, constructed of local materials intent on blending in with the surroundings – rock, sand, redwood; even canvas for the roofs.  The structures are low and horizontal, connected organically by walkways, terraces, and gardens.   The furniture and decor were also designed by Wright.

Taliesin West

Is there a Taliesin East, you ask?  Of course there is!  Wright’s primary estate was built in the Wisconsin River valley on one of his favorite boyhood hills.

But over the years, Taliesin West has gained the most notoriety.  What was once Wright’s winter residence, studio, and offices is now a National Historic Landmark and a museum to the man.  Taliesin West serves as the home of the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation and School of Architecture, and is open daily for tours.

Some content sourced from the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation website, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Don’t Throw Stones

Back in Colorado where we used to live, there was a house down the street – a new build – where you walked through the front door, crossed a narrow hallway, and immediately found yourself outside again on a terrace.  The design was intentional (thanks to stunning views of Pikes Peak), encouraging outdoor living as much as indoor.  It’s a design principle rooted in one of America’s most famous residences.  Welcome to New Canaan, Connecticut’s Glass House.

Imagine a classroom assignment where you’re asked to create a pizza.  You choose whatever toppings and seasonings you like, the pizza’s shape and size, and the means to bake it.  But there’s a catch: You can’t use a crust.  Somehow you’d still put it together, right?  Maybe that’s how architect Phillip Johnson approached his design of The Glass House back in 1949.  It’s got windows and doors, a roof, rooms, and furniture, just like any other house; just no walls.

Okay, The Glass House has walls, of course, but their transparency is meant to throw the concept of “house” for a major loop.

As a student of architecture, I have a love/hate relationship with The Glass House.  My first thought when I learned about it was, “I hate it.  It’s just a steel and glass box.  And everything I’d do in there would be on display for all the world to see.  Everything“.

But like important works of art, the more you study The Glass House the more you appreciate all that it has to offer.  You notice the fully open floor plan (bathroom aside), suggesting “rooms” can be defined by furniture or floor coverings, not just walls.  Its transparency invites the outdoors in (whether or not you open the glass door on each of its four sides), suggesting the experience of “home” can go well beyond the walls.  Finally, The Glass House boldly declares that less is more, meaning life in the dozen rooms of a McMansion pales in comparison to a cohesive collection of just three or four.

[Architect’s Note: “Less is more” is a famous mantra in architecture circles, coined by American architect Mies van der Rohe (of whom Phillip Johnson was a disciple).  Marie Kondo might come to mind as well.]

Am I a fan of the harsh German glasarchitektur style of The Glass House?  No.  Would I want to live in such a house?  Absolutely not.  Yet I must admit, its concept of indoor-outdoor living (which has inspired countless residential designs since) is intriguing.  It’s what makes Fallingwater such a captivating design.  Furthermore, the siting of The Glass House puts to rest any concerns I had about privacy, since it’s nestled within fifty acres of open landscape.

The Glass House, as you might expect, is in America’s National Trust for Historic Preservation, and open to visitors through guided property tours.  As the famous saying goes, “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones”.  I’m pretty sure Phillip Johnson didn’t throw any.  After all, The Glass House was where he made his home for over fifty years.

Now for the latest on LEGO Fallingwater…

____________________

LEGO Fallingwater – Update #7  (Read how this project got started in Perfect Harmony)

Today we spent entirely “off-model” again, building up the structure you see in front.  60 pages (or 66%, or 169 minutes) into the build, this is what we have:

This week’s photo should look virtually identical to last week’s, because all I did was add layers to the “house” in front (which doesn’t look at all like a house).  The only excitement was adding that balcony jutting out in the left rear corner.

I’ve bored you again with the model update, so here’s a poetic quote instead, from Wright himself about designing Fallingwater:

“The visit to the waterfall in the woods stays with me and a domicile has taken vague shape in my mind to the music of the stream… this structure might serve to indicate that the sense of shelter… has no limitations as to form except the materials used and the methods by which they are employed…”

Tune in next Thursday as construction continues!  Now for another nod to Frank Lloyd Wright…

Wingspread

The last of Wright’s Prairie Style houses may have the most creative name.  “Wingspread” was designed and built in 1937 in Racine, WI for the SC Johnson family, for whom Wright also designed his more famous Johnson Wax administration building nearby.

Wingspread is a sprawling pinwheel plan, with each of its single-story arms serving a different purpose.  The central octagon is three stories high.  Wingspread is full of fireplaces (five), but more of interest is Wright’s accommodation of requests by the Johnson children.  For them he added a Juliet balcony bedroom and a crow’s nest.  Let it also be known Wright had an occasional bit of fun with his designs.  Wingspread contains a disappearing dining table and a great room clerestory ceiling inspired by the look of a teepee.

“Juliet” balcony

Wingspread has been converted into a conference center today, but is open for tours by reservation.

Some content sourced from The Glass House website, the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation website, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Built More than Most

My short but adventurous blogging tour through my favorite works of American architecture has included Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater and Greene and Greene’s Gamble House, two residences that couldn’t look more different if they tried. Today we add a third, but to call this one a “house” would be like saying Niagara Falls is a tall drink of water.  Palace?  Château?  Both fit the bill, er… Bilt.  Welcome to North Carolina’s Biltmore Mansion.

Biltmore Mansion

If you enjoy the occasional retreat into the mountains, maybe you’ve thought about owning a second place someday.  A modest cabin on a lake or a condo on the ski slopes.  You’d get away for the weekend to enjoy the fresh air and recharge.  You might call it your “little mountain escape”, which is exactly how George Washington Vanderbilt II described his summer home in Asheville, North Carolina.  All 180,000 square feet of it.

“Front door”

I’ll say this for G.W. Vanderbilt II: he knew how to spend money.  Beginning in 1889 and for the next six years, Vanderbilt created the Biltmore estate on hundreds of thousands of forested acres in North Carolina.  His undertaking was so massive it required the purchase of 700 separate parcels of property.  The mansion itself, the design of architect Richard Morris Hunt, required a temporary three-mile railroad connection (to deliver materials), a woodworking factory, and a kiln capable of creating 32,000 bricks/day.  At the height of its construction the Biltmore estate employed over 1,000 workers.

The mansion itself is fairly indescribable, at least with the handful of paragraphs I allot myself today.  Vanderbilt opted for 250 rooms spread across four stories, with 65 fireplaces and three kitchens.  This was his second home?  What the heck did his first place look like, Versailles?

“Dining room”

Since we just watched the Super Bowl, here’s a fitting way to picture the size of Biltmore: each of its four floors is the size of a football field.  You can sleep in any one of 35 bedrooms. You can dine in 3,000 square feet of banquet hall alongside sixty other guests.  You can choose from 10,000 books in the two-story library.  You’ll climb a hundred steps on Biltmore’s massive spiral staircase to get to your fourth-floor bedroom (I suggest turning in early).  Finally, the adjacent carriage house is 20,000 square feet – another third of a football field – because you get to choose from Vanderbilt’s twenty horse-drawn vehicles.

The Biltmore mansion also has a basement (of course it does), the largest in America.  Vanderbilt liked his fun, so this floor houses a 70,000-gallon swimming pool, a bowling alley, and a gymnasium.  Throw in electric lights, forced-air heating, walk-in refrigerators, and elevators, and you have a thoroughly state-of-the art structure (at least for the late 1800’s).

Vanderbilt’s bedroom

News to me, one of architecture’s styles is known as “Châteauesque”.  It describes a handful of the mansions designed in the Gilded Age of the late 1800’s (some covered in a recent tour of Newport, R.I. by blogger Lyssy in the City).  The Biltmore certainly qualifies as a château.  It’s the largest privately-owned house in the United States.  If you’re looking to get your 10,000 steps, check out the tour information here.

Now for the latest on LEGO Fallingwater…

____________________

LEGO Fallingwater – Update #6  (Read how this project got started in Perfect Harmony)

Today we spent entirely “off-model”, creating the random looking structure you see in front.  50 pages (or 55%, or 148 minutes) into the build, this is what we have:

I had to reference the photo of the completed model to understand what I’m building here.  It’s the house itself, of course, but only the base, largely hidden from view when the model is complete.  It appears I’ll be building up this part of the house in similar fashion for the next couple of weeks.

Since today’s update was a little boring, how about an interesting coincidence instead?  I just noticed “Fallingwater” contains the letters, F, L, and W… in that order.  Talk about an architect’s “signature”, eh?  Wouldn’t surprise me if Frank Lloyd Wright came up with the name himself.

Tune in next Thursday as construction continues!  Now for another nod to Frank Lloyd Wright…

Frederick C. Robie House

No history of residential American architecture would be complete without including the Robie House, which you’ll find on the south side of Chicago.  This very long, very narrow house is often described as “two large rectangles that seem to slide past one another”.

Frederick C. Robie House

The Robie House is Wright’s best example of his Prairie Style, which “responds to the expansive American plains by emphasizing the horizontal over the vertical”.  The cantilevered roof, window bands, and liberal use of brick are also characteristic of the style.  The house is laid out with an open, naturally-lit floor plan, a novel design concept for the early 1900s.

Given its troubled history (including its sale a mere fourteen months after it was built), it’s a wonder the Robie still stands today.  The house is now incorporated into the University of Chicago campus and open most days for tours.

Some content sourced from the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation website, and  Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.