A Ringing Endorsement

This time of year the choices for sports on television are few and far between. Sure there’s a lot of basketball being played, but the football season wraps up on Sunday (Super Bowl LX), baseball doesn’t get underway until April, and unless you have the time and patience to watch golf you’re gonna channel surf without catching decent waves. But it’s also something of an illusion, because the Winter Olympic Games kick off tomorrow in Italy. You did know the Olympics are about to get underway, didn’t you?

The 25th edition of the Winter Games comes to your living room in the next two weeks, hosted in Milan, Cortina, and several towns in the surrounding Dolomite mountains.  The natural venues of the region look spectacular, and no doubt the Italians will be worthy hosts to thousands of the world’s best athletes.  We’ll be treated to sixteen different sporting competitions on snow and ice, from figure skating to bobsledding to ski jumping.  Behind the scenes, you’ll get the usual inspirational stories, heartbreaking moments, and thrilling photo-finishes.  I just hope you actually hear about any of it.

Just one section of the Games board

ESPN.com, where I get my daily dose of sports, includes a list of “Top Headlines” at the beginning of their home page.  Today, less than forty-eight hours before the opening ceremonies, there is nothing about the Games.  No updates on the American athletes, no projections on when or where the U.S. will be at its most competitive, no “primer” to get you ready to sit down and watch… nothing.  You have to scroll way down, past NFL-this and NBA-that before you finally get to anything about what’s going on in Northern Italy.  Heck, even the Westminster Dog Show rated more press than the Winter Olympics today (which always begs the question, “Is a dog show considered ‘sports'”?)

No, not these “Olympics”

I’m glued to the coverage of the Olympics every time they come around (which is every two years, counting the Summer Games).  Even with paid, professional athletes, the Olympics are the purest form of global sports competition we have left.  The headlines – which will finally include the Olympics for the next two weeks – will speak more positive than negative, more jaw-dropping than ho-hum, with virtually no political undertones.  How refreshing is that?

At least ESPN allots some space to the Games, however far down the page it may be.  Have a look at any of the major news websites and you’ll be challenged to find similar coverage.  Americans are too preoccupied with what’s going on in Washington, Wall Street, and the West Bank.  It’s ironic that today’s lead news story is about the Olympics (though not really).  Savannah Guthrie – one of the hosts of NBC’s television broadcast – pulled out to be with her family during the apparent abduction of her mother.  My prayers are with her.

One month for just $10.99

Since you’ll be hard-pressed to find a primer, here are a few tidbits about the upcoming Games.  There are 232 athletes on the U.S. Olympic team, the largest in our history of participation.  There are 25 venues for the competition – in four clusters across Northern Italy – making it the most geographically widespread Winter Olympics in history.  And for the next eighteen days, you’ll be able to catch all of the action (at reasonable times) on some form of NBC broadcasting, whether streaming or live television.  You’ll even get your fill of curling, easily the most misunderstood Olympic sport of them all.

(click to enlarge)

The Olympic Games, as the broadcasters are sure to say over and over, “transcend sports”.  The world records, the stories behind them, and the individuals who train tirelessly for these moments deserve our attention.  Team USA’s flag bearers this year are speed skater Erin Jackson and bobsledder Frank Del Duca.  Think about it – both of these athletes chose sports where their moment of glory (or defeat) starts and ends in a matter of minutes.  They are everyday people whose best-in-class performances are brought to the world but once every four years.

Now go read all about it, or better yet… watch.  Otherwise I’ll think you’re ignoring my ringing endorsement of the Winter Olympic Games.

Some content sourced from the NBC Olympics website, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”. 

Seasoned Greeting

Back in my days in a corporate office, where the telephone was still the preferred means of communication, my peers and I developed a habit of answering calls without a greeting. The phone would ring and we’d simply answer with our name, like “John Smith…” and then wait for the caller to start the conversation. Whether this was an effort to be businesslike or a little intimidating can be debated. But it always felt awkward to me, like one of those greeting cards with nothing printed on the inside.

Did you know the origins of “hello” go back six hundred years?  We’ve led with one version or another of the greeting countless times for centuries.  Take your pick from “hi”, “hiya”, “hey”, “howdy”, and even “hellaw” down here in the South: human nature demands something of an icebreaker before a conversation gets underway.  The no-greeting business calls I mentioned above suggest this is not a conversation, this is business.  Otherwise we need a starter word.  Think about it.  How awkward would it be to hug, shake a hand, or fist-bump without uttering a single word?

The history of “hello” is dry and speculative but it’s safe to say most of us started using it as soon as we could speak.  Then, inevitably, we either embraced the word as our greeting or moved on to one of its offspring.  For me the preference was “hey”.  I find myself using “hey” whether I’m meeting someone for the first time or they’re a long-time acquaintance.  I tried “hey” on for size a long time ago and it suits me just fine.

How “hello” reduced to “hi” is anyone’s guess, but it makes sense in the framework of the not-so-Queen’s English we use in America.  A Brit saying “hi” doesn’t sound quite right.  An American?  Pretty much what we expect.  A Brit can substitute “Good morning” or “Good evening” for “Hello”, while Americans just go with “Morning” or “Evening”.

But even “hi” seems a little passé these days. I’m just as likely to get a Yo!, Sup!, or Hey-ya! from Millennials and younger.  Furthermore, if you gave any of those generations the choice they’d rather greet you with a text than with their voice.  That leads to a whole new approach to starting conversations.  Who starts a text message with “Hello, Dave!”  More likely it’s just “Dave…”, an emoji, or no greeting at all.

[Blogger’s note: My favorite instance of “hello” comes at the end of the movie Jerry Maguire.  The line, “You had me at ‘hello'” has been recycled many times since but never as powerfully.  Pretty much launched Renée Zellweger’s career in a single sentence.]

Beyond “hello” itself, the inflections of the voice convert the greeting into something else entirely.  We demand attention by saying He-LLO!!!  We question attention by saying HELLO? (… “is anybody home?”).  And if we say “hello” quickly we’re suggesting we don’t have time for the conversation that follows.  A greeting can make a lasting impression inside of a single word.

We’ve lived in the South for a little while now, and in that time we’ve learned a new approach when it comes to greeting one another. When we’re introduced to someone for the first time we often exchange “hey” as the greeting. When we see someone we already know we go with “hey hey”.  I’m still trying on “hey hey” for size.  It feels a little forced to someone who grew up in the West.  Give me a few more years.

A decade or two from now a wholly new greeting will be out there; one we’ll never see coming (seriously, did you ever think “yo yo” would replace “hello”?)  Maybe this new salutation will suit me or maybe I’ll flat out reject it.  Either way, “hello” rests comfortably in my back pocket whenever I need it.  Six hundred years of history suggests it’s not going anywhere in the next twenty.

Some content sourced from the BBC article, “‘Hullo, hillo, holla’, the 600-year-old origins of the word ‘Hello'”. 

Worthless Wardrobe Boxes

I’ve always liked the play on words of Men’s Wearhouse. If you’re familiar with MW you know they cover more ground than just formal wear. They’ve set aside an area for tuxedos and such, but they have other sections for dress shirts, accessories, and even shoes. It’s like walking through a miniature department store… which is probably why MW is destined for the dust bin sometime in the coming year.

Just eighteen months after Saks Fifth Avenue acquired bankrupt Neiman-Marcus (for the “bargain” price of $2.65 billion) Saks itself filed for bankruptcy; just yesterday.  The 2024 merger of these big-box luxury retailers (which included Bergdorf Goodman) never really came to fruition. Chalk it up to biting off more than they could chew, or more likely to the impact of the changing habits of consumers.  Today’s shoppers want smaller, more specific brick-and-mortar options; that is, whenever they can drag themselves away from online purchasing.

The shuttering of department stores is not limited to the high-end verions, of course.  Macy’s is in the process of closing 150 “underperforming locations”.  JC Penny, Kohl’s, and Marshall’s are closing outlets here and there.  Even Carter’s, the popular option for children’s clothing, is calling it quits on 150 locations.  And Sears, which had almost 3,000 locations just fifteen years ago, is down to a mere five.  Frankly, I didn’t know Sears had any locations anymore.

Chicago’s Sears Tower

Sears (or the Sears, Roebuck and Co I remember as a child) was my family’s go-to-department store for just about anything.  My brothers and I were outfitted in Sears-brand clothing.  My mother purchased all kinds of items for her kitchen.  My father built up his workshop with dozens of Craftsman tools.  And of course, the Sears catalog was not only a kid’s dream-book of Christmas wishes, but its arrival in the mailbox was a sign Santa was on his way… not to your house but to the toy department at Sears.

Like many other things in the States, department stores were based on the originals in Europe.  Harrods of London has been around since 1849 and boasts of 1,100,000 square feet of selling space, making it the largest department store on the continent.  Paris hosts several stores I’ve never heard of yet many have been around as long as Harrods.  And Australia’s David Jones is considered the world’s longest continuously operating department store (since 1838!)

As you read this post – and if you’re Millennial or older – I’m sure a department store of your own experience comes to mind.  Towards the East Coast: Gimbels, Hudson’s, or Wanamaker’s.  Towards the West: May Company, Bullock’s, or Robinson’s.  In Chicago alone: Marshall Field’s, Carson Pirie Scott, or Wieboldt’s.  In Canada: Eaton’s.  The list is endless, even as most of them are downsizing or closing altogether.

In deference to my former department store habits, I also prefer more specific retail these days.  My shoes come from shoe stores.  My shirts come from stores of particular name brands.  But with shopping malls closing along with their aforementioned “anchors”, my stores of choice are now stand-alones or in outlet malls.  Now that I think about it, outlet malls are kind of like outdoor department stores, aren’t they?

I may be nostalgic for the department stores of my past, but I certainly understand why the concept has come and is about to be gone.  We have more convenient, more tailored options these days.  Which has me wondering about supermarkets.  Supermarkets are also under the threat of the changing habits of consumers.  No, I don’t expect a return to those wonderful merchant-driven street markets you find all over Europe.  But we are getting more comfortable with placing orders ahead of time and having groceries delivered to our car or front door.  In other words, enjoy shopping in “food warehouses” while you still can, because department stores are about to become nothing more than worthless wardrobe boxes.

Some content sourced from the CNN Business article, “Saks Global files for bankruptcy protection…”, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”. 

Fill ‘er Up

Several years ago at a banquet, I stood at the podium to introduce the evening’s guest speaker. After sharing some of her background and accomplishments, I went with the expected, “So without further ado, please welcome”…, and then I paused. And paused some more. I’d forgotten the speaker’s name. The silence, as the saying goes, was deafening. Eventually I found her name in my notes, but not without an uncomfortable gap in my speech. Perhaps a filler word would’ve smoothed things over.

Do you use filler words?  Actually, let’s make that question a statement.  You use filler words.  Every now and then in conversation you’ll throw in the occasional “uh”, “like”, or “so”.  Filler words do exactly what their label implies: they fill up the awkward gap of silence created by a pause.  Every one of us can recall an experience where we’ve left out filler words in a vain attempt to keep the polish on our speech, but it’s a no-win situation.  If you go with the pause your audience looks at each other with one of those Is he okay? glances.  If you go with a filler word you’re hinting you’re not completely on top of your material.

The parade of filler words is much longer than the commoners I mentioned above.  The filler “uh” comes from its own family, including “um”, “oh”, “er”, and “ah”; tiny signs of reluctance to say whatever comes next.  And speaking of next, how about “very”, “really”, and “highly”?  These three are fillers disguised as words of emphasis but are usually superfluous.  Then we have “You know…” and “You see…”, which seem to politely draw the listener into the conversation.  But sorry, they’re also fillers, allowing a pause at the start of a thought.  Finally (as if there’s an end to this parade), let’s add “I guess” and “I suppose”, both designed to soften a response when what you should go with instead is a confident “yes” or “no”.

I deliberately skipped one filler here because it deserves it’s own parade.  “Like” sprinted to the front and center of casual English in the last couple of generations, taking up a lot of the spaces “uh” and his pals used to fill.  Some people use “like” so often it starts to feel like every other word they’re saying.  But make no mistake – every “like” is simply a mini-pause to allow the speaker to reboot their thoughts.

Watch out, because filler words can be contagious.  I used to work for a company where it seemed every one of my teammates couldn’t start a sentence without the word “So”.  Somehow “so” sounds a little smoother than “uh” but it’s basically the same filler.  Before I knew it I caught myself also using “so”, as if it was the only way to start a sentence.  At least “so” has a built-in bonus: you can drag it out for drama.  So-o-o-o-o…

Filler words somehow sound better with a foreign accent.  The Irish “um” sounds like the more pleasing ehm.  Even throwing in a bunch of “you knows” in the Irish accent seems to work.  And speaking of accents, Hollywood (or maybe just Los Angeles) brought us Valley Girl talk, which includes a weird form of attitude along with its own set of meaningless filler words like “totally”, “whatever”, and “as if” (think Cher from Clueless).  Valley Girl talk has had a remarkable run considering its roots were in the 1980s.  You still hear the words today.

The next time you call out a friend with Hello? Is anybody home? for not paying attention, consider they’re trying to avoid filler words by simply not saying anything.  That’s harder to do than it sounds.  Try speaking for a few minutes without filler words.  It’s so difficult it’s birthed a string of funny videos on TikTok.  As for me, I’ll keep using my fillers wherever I need them.  Especially when I forget the name of a guest speaker.

Some content sourced from the CNN Health article, “Should you stop saying ‘um’?  Here’s what the experts said”.

Swimming Upstream

I can think of a dozen name brands I gotten hooked on for years, only to see them suddenly disappear from the shelves, never to return. Breakfast cereals. Hair spray. Cars. And what do we do when this happens? Simply find another brand and get used to it – easy-peasy. But when your streaming television service drops an essential channel, you can’t just jump to the next provider. Try that and you’ll hit your head on the cage they have you securely locked into.

Even if you’re not a sports fan, you’re probably tuned into my topic today.  YouTube TV – which provides me the five channels of streaming television I care about (and 95 forgettable others), dropped ESPN from its lineup.  It wasn’t like they warned us months ago they were renegotiating with Disney (ESPN’s parent), and that these talks weren’t going so well.  Instead they alerted us last Thursday just before midnight – with an email coyly titled “An update on our partnership with Disney”.  Then, the following morning, ESPN was gone.  On Halloween.  How fitting.

Without going into the weeds on why ESPN was dropped, let’s just call it the proverbial contract dispute.  Disney wants one number.  YouTube TV wants another.  A stalemate akin to what we’re seeing in Washington right now.  Yes, what D.C. is blocking is so much more important than a television sports channel.  But when you’re a die-hard college football fan you can relate to losing an “essential service”.

Getting my ESPN back is not like choosing another breakfast cereal.  If only it were that easy.  Instead, we have to shift to an entirely different grocery aisle.  Make that an entirely different supermarket.  As soon as YouTube TV dropped ESPN, Disney was only too happy to promote its own streaming service.  Sign up for Disney+, including ESPN and Hulu!!!  Only $29.95 per month – a savings of $5/month!!!  Only twelve months of subscription required!!!

All those exclamation points are a ruse, as if this is a service I can’t live without.  Disney Channel?  Not my thing.  Hulu?  I’m already getting enough entertainment on Netflix.  I just want ESPN please.  And apparently I should be happy to pay a minimum of $360 for it, in addition to my monthly $80 for YouTube TV.

Bless our tech-savvy children.  We turn to them for all things electronic.  I checked in with one of my sons – who is every bit the college football fanatic I am – and he came to my rescue.  Fubo – a streaming service looking like a twin to YouTube TV – offers a free one-week trial that includes ESPN.  It’s kind of like Congress signing a stopgap spending bill to keep the government open.  Now I have another seven days to figure out what to do.

YouTube TV promises a credit if the lack of negotiations with Disney continues long enough (sorry, the same does not apply to our government).  But I can’t necessarily wait for that credit.  In one week I’ve got to decide if I’m a YouTube TV guy or a Fubo one.  Can’t have both (at least, according to my budget).

Of course, it feels almost inevitable that Fubo will run into a contract dispute with Disney as well.  So even if I go that route I could lose ESPN again.  Maybe I’m getting forced into a Disney+ subscription after all?  But another $360/year?  No way.  I’d sooner get on a plane and go watch my college football games in person.  Er, assuming the FAA doesn’t cancel my flights.  Swimming upstream indeed.  Sigh…

—————-

LEGO Trevi Fountain – Update #3

(Read about the start of this build in Brick Wall Waterfall)

We resumed our fountain build this week with more confidence than the last, accompanied by the merriment of Paganini’s Violin Concerto No. 1.  Bags 6 and 7 – of 15 bags of pieces – were filled with tiny, tiny finger-numbing LEGOs, and at times I wondered just what the heck I was putting together.  Didn’t look like the makings of a fountain to me.

Tiny, tiny!

According to LEGO, water is white and blue.  I suppose the white is meant to be rushing water (as in “waterfall”) while the blue is calm water (as in “pool”).  We shall see.  But check out the look of the fountain in the final photo.  Anyone else see a monster’s mouth with white teeth?

Strange creations

Since this is my fifth LEGO model, it’s high time I make the following proclamation:  LEGO never leaves out a piece.  Never.  I still have moments where I’m searching through a pile of pieces in vain for the one I need.  I almost get to the feeling of “it’s not here”.  But suddenly there the little guy is, staring up at me as if to say, “What took you so long?”  Some day I’d love to see how LEGO pulls this off.  Thousands of pieces in every box, not a single one of them left out.  That’s some logistical magic going on there.

I’m proud to say I made zero mistakes on the build this time around, a dramatic improvement from a week ago.  Okay, that’s not entirely accurate.  I left a piece off the back of the fountain, but immediately discovered my error when I added a section and realized there was nothing to support it.  Fixed in a jiffy, but the merry instruments on Paganini’s violin concerto sounded even more gleeful as they saw my confidence take a hit.

Running build time: 2 hrs. 27 min.

Total leftover pieces: 13

Horses on Circular Courses

In 1972, Billy Preston topped the Billboard Hot 100 chart with the catchy “Will It Go Round In Circles”. A year later, The Spinners spent five weeks at #1 on Billboard’s R&B chart with “I’ll Be Around”. More recently, Kacey Musgraves’ debut single “Merry Go ‘Round” won the Grammy Award for Best Country Song.  All of which is to say, if I’m asked to celebrate “National Carousel Day” I have a great choice of theme songs for the occasion… played on endless loop, of course.

A double-decker!

National Merry-Go-Round Day (I prefer “Carousel”) was this past July 25th, as it has been every year since 2014.  Did you skip it like I did?  The holiday claims to “celebrate the carousel’s history and joy, particularly marking the first U.S. patent by William Schneider in 1871.”  And to celebrate, we’re meant to visit a local carousel, go for a spin, and post pictures of ourselves doing so online.  So we drop everything we’re doing on July 25th and climb on a wooden horse?  National M-G-R Day doesn’t even rate as a Hallmark holiday (and don’t waste your time trying to find a card to prove me wrong).

Contrary to my opinion about M-G-R Day, I think carousels are charming and a bit of innocent fun (other than those brass rings, which we’ll get to in a second).  Carousels inspired memorable scenes in Mary Poppins and BigCarousel was the Rodgers and Hammerstein musical that Time magazine deemed “the best of the 20th century”.  The “Carousel of Progress” was (and still is) one of the more unique attractions at Disneyland.  And of course, carousels led to those pipe and metal spinners we all played on at the park when we were kids.

Carousel is derived from the French word for “little battle”, which hints at why we’re riding them at all today.  In 17th century Europe, equestrian tournaments included “ring jousting”, where the rider attempts to spear a ring-on-a-string with his joust as he flies by.  To practice this sport without wearing out the horses, a clever soul invented the carousel, complete with wooden horses on poles and a real horse to pull the device in circles.  Eventually carousels made their way into carnivals, and then to the prominent locations where you find them today.

Care for a ring?

Now you also understand why early carousels had ring dispensers.  They were a nod to ring jousting!  The dispensers were filled with iron rings along with a few brass ones.  If you were lucky enough to ride an outside horse and grab a brass ring (which is harder than it sounds as your horse goes up and down), you could exchange the ring for a prize or another loop on the carousel.  For good reasons – safety being one – ring dispensers have been removed from most carousels today.

The people who came up with National M-G-R Day should’ve probably gone with “International”, because many of the world’s most distinguished carousels spin outside of the United States.  The Carousel El Dorado in Tokyo, Japan, built in 1907, is the oldest amusement park ride still in operation in the country.   The Lakeside Park Carousel in Ontario, Canada (1905) includes a self-playing organ that uses rolled sheets of music, rewinding one while playing the next.  The Letná Carousel in Prague, Czechia (1892!) is one of the oldest in Europe, remodeled in 2022 but still housed in its original wooden pavilion.

Looff Carousel (1911)

America has its share of prominent “gallopers” as well.  The Looff Carousel in Santa Cruz, CA is one of the few remaining with a ring dispenser, and entertains with the music of three organs.  The Over-The-Jumps Carousel in Little Rock, AR (1924) simulates the natural movement of a horse instead of just going up and down on a pole.  And the Flying Horse Carousel in Westerly, Rhode Island (1876!) is exactly as advertised.  The horses are attached to the center spindle instead of the wooden platform, creating a better sensation of flying through the air.

Dorothea Laub Carousel (1910)

Okay, I have a confession.  I had the perfect opportunity to celebrate National M-G-R Day just days after it happened this year.  My wife and I traveled to San Diego with our children and grandchildren for a beach vacation and found ourselves in Balboa Park, home of the Dorothea Laub Carousel (brass ring dispenser!)  If we hadn’t already worn out the little ones on a long walk through the Japanese Friendship Garden we might’ve made it to the wooden horses.  But I’m not losing sleep about it.  After all, National M-G-R Day will come ’round again next year.

Some content sourced from Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Ellen Makes Her Move

When we moved into our current house (and even the one before it), we made the classic mistake of saying, “We’re never moving again”.  After all, picking up and going from one place to the next can be a real pain in the you-know-what, especially with pets and vehicles to relocate on top of the furniture and clothes. But at least we’re only talking about moving houses. What if you had to move an entire town?

Ellenton, SC

If you live in an RV or a tiny home, you’d think nothing of pulling up stakes and going somewhere else.  You have the wheels or the flatbed to make it happen.  But moving an entire town means a population of people and a collection of structures.  it sounds like something that could only happen on a Hollywood movie set.  Unless you’re the U.S. government with its sights set on Ellenton, South Carolina.

Ellenton train depot

Ellenton first appeared on a map the way a lot of small towns did back in the day.  The railroad was interested in running new tracks through the farms of the area and a deal was made to acquire the land, including a plot for the train station.  In Ellenton’s case, the railroad developer was smitten with the primary landowner’s daughter (Ellen).  The relationship never blossomed but he did name the budding town after her.  Thus we have “Ellen’s Town”, shortened to “Ellenton”.

Ellenton grew quickly in the late 1800s, from a host of agricultural productions to a working, living community of 600 residents.  Eventually you’d find churches, schools, a post office, a general store, a dairy, and even a milling company and a cotton gin.  But what nobody saw coming was the potential of the area for the construction of a massive facility know as the Savannah River Site (SRS).  In the 1950’s in Cold War America, the U.S. government decided Ellenton and its surrounds were the perfect riverside location for plutonium and tritium production, for the development of the hydrogen bomb.  Ellenton “won the lottery” over a hundred other locations.

I can’t imagine sitting in Ellenton’s town hall back when the announcement was made.  Someone who drew a very short straw had to stand in front of the residents and say, “Sorry folks, we’re going to tear down your town so we need you to find somewhere else to live”.  Then the government wrote checks for the properties and businesses and simply walked away.  Eminent domain in capital letters.

I’ll admit I thought the government really did move Ellenton to another location.  I pictured a cartoon image of the world’s largest spatula, sliding under Ellenton’s streets and buildings like an entire sheet cake, then dropping the whole mess several miles away.  But I really thought the government moved Ellenton because we live right down the street from a town called New Ellenton.  Turns out, New Ellenton is simply where a good chunk of the original residents chose to call home.  The government had nothing to do with it.

Maybe the government didn’t move the living but the law required they move the dead.  By the time Ellenton and several other small towns were acquired and shut down, the SRS property encompassed 310 square miles.  That meant the relocation of 130 cemeteries, amounting to over 6,000 grave sites.  They didn’t get every last one, so it’s fair to say old Ellenton still has a few residents.

The black-and-white photos I share here – from the Ellenton website – give the town a charming, old-timey feel.  The few residents alive today hold reunions to share the memories of a place they can no longer see or even visit.  Some of Ellenton’s stories make it sound very cozy.  I wish I could say the same about New Ellenton, which is nothing more than a couple miles of highway with gas stations and bars scattered on either side.  Frankly, the only reason you drive through New Ellenton is because you’re on your way to somewhere else.

I wouldn’t be nostalgic for Ellenton if the government didn’t make it disappear.  Kind of reminds me of Brigadoon, the Scottish village that magically appeared out of the mist every hundred years.  Maybe Ellenton will appear out of a nuclear winter on the hundredth anniversary of it’s own demise.  In the meantime, a songwriter captured the story of the town in a rather sad ballad.  “The Death of Ellenton” was never a big hit, but the town it celebrates sure took one.

Some content sourced from the WJBF website article, “Hometown History: The Forgotten Town of Ellenton”; the Ellenton SC website (including all photographs); and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Only In Iowa

If you’ve ever made graham crackers from scratch (which are miles better than the store-bought ones), there’s a step in the recipe where you have to get your hands dirty. Take a stick of butter, cut it into very small pieces, dump the pieces into the mixture of dry ingredients, and dive on in with your fingers until the dough starts to clump together. It may be the only time butter and my hands ever come in contact with each other. Which is also to say, I won’t be sculpting a butter cow any time soon.

Sculptor, cow

Creating art out of food seems like an inevitable destination. I mean, back in Michelangelo’s day everyone was taking a block of marble and seeing what they could do with it. Then all but one of them quickly realized there was only one Michelangelo. The others probably turned to an easier material to work with like wood or clay. 1,000 years on, we’re sculpting food. Chocolate is a popular medium. Cakes are shaped into just about everything imaginable. But a cow made out of butter – what’s that all about?

A more fitting Hawkeye State image

We turn to Iowa to learn more about this oddity.  Most people prefer to fly over Iowa but since you’re reading and not flying, let me enlighten you.  On the list of 10 Things to Know About Iowa, there is no butter and there is no cow. There are a lot of pigs (the most of any state) and millions of acres of corn (also “the most”), and Iowa’s “Hawkeye” nickname is a reference to the birth of the red delicious apple (who knew?).  But none of this gets us to butter and cows.

The “10 Things…” list does mention the Iowa State Fair, and it is here that we find real cows by the hundreds… and a life-sized one made out of butter.  The Fair, whose 2025 edition wrapped up three weeks ago, has been making “buttered cows” since 1911, thanks to five Iowans who’ve passed the butter baton down over the years.  The latest, Sarah Pratt, has been making the cows for the last nineteen years, and only after apprenticing with the last sculptor fifteen years before that.  Some people blog; others make cows out of butter.

The 1911 original

Like papier-mâché, a butter cow is created on top of a frame built from wood, wire, and/or metal.  Then we heap on some fun statistics.  600 lbs. of “low moisture, pure cream, Iowa butter” is applied to create a cow that’s five-and-a-half feet tall and eight feet long.  The sculptor’s “studio” is a walk-in cooler set to 40ºF.  After the cow is displayed at the fair, all that butter is recycled for use on the next ten years of cows.  Unless you’d rather use it for toast, which would butter 19,200 slices.

Michelangelo didn’t stop sculpting after his famous David, of course, and neither does Sarah Pratt with her butter cows.  Also following tradition, she creates a “companion sculpture” to keep the cow company.  Sometimes the companion is an homage to Iowa, such as a John Deere tractor.  Most years the companion is a random anniversary, like the 40th anniversary of Neil Armstrong’s walk on the moon (totally random because Neil wasn’t born in Iowa).  This year the sculpture featured the characters from “Toy Story”, denoting the movie’s 30th anniversary.  You get the feeling Sarah enjoys sculpting butter so much that a life-sized cow just isn’t enough.

Woody, Buzz

For all of my research, I can’t figure out why a cow made out of butter and Iowa belong in the same sentence.  Nearby Wisconsin and Michigan are better known for dairy cows.  California tops the list of the five states producing the most butter (and Iowa isn’t one of the other four).  No matter, this tradition isn’t stopping anytime soon.  The butter cow even has a place in the Smithsonian Institution (thankfully, as a replica that will never melt).

I love butter, but more on top of baked goods and in graham cracker recipes than in the shape of a cow.  I will admit to buying my butter by the brick instead of by the stick.  But now that I know about Iowa’s annual creations, I’ll never look at my morning toast again without thinking, mooooooooo.

Some content sourced from the Iowa State Fair website, the U.S. News article, “10 Things to Know About Iowa”, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Ten Days to “Ben-Yays”

I’ve never met a French baked good I didn’t want to devour at first sight. Macarons have called my name ever since my wife and I tried them in a little shop in Strasbourg. I’ve made a surprisingly good Croquet Madame (disguised as a three-cheese breakfast pizza) considering my limited skills in the kitchen. And croissants, well, croissants speak for themselves don’t they? So when a neighbor challenged my wife and I to make beignets ten days ago, I confidently replied, “oui!”

“ben-yays”

Technically we’re not talking about a baked good today.  Beignets are fried in oil, like doughnuts.  In fact, they’re exactly like sugar doughnuts, just not as sweet.  Think Krispy Kreme’s Original Glazed without the glaze.  Small, chewy pillows of heaven.

So why would a neighbor request beignets?  Because she invited us to a college football game watch (Clemson vs. Louisiana State) and she’s one of those who turns a basic entertainment into a full-on festivity.  Louisiana State is in Baton Rouge so her menu was start-to-finish Cajun. Étouffée. Muffuletta. Red Beans and Rice. Chantilly Cake. I mean, if she’s going to make all of that how could I say non to beignets?

étoufée

Thankfully, I found an “Easy Beignets Recipe” online (note: whenever a recipe starts with “easy”, it’s anything but).  At least I already had the ingredients in my pantry.  But beignets start out like a high school science experiment.  Heat the water to exactly 105°.  Add yeast and a little sugar, because yeast “feeds” on sugar.  Then watch it all foam.  If it doesn’t foam, you killed the yeast and you have to start over. (No pressure Dave, little lives are at stake here.)

science experiment

My yeast foamed (it lives!) so I was then allowed to proceed with the more traditional ingredients.  Shortening, sugar, milk, and egg whites all mixed together, to which you add boiling water.  When the temp is exactly 105°-110° (again with the science experiment) add the foamy yeast, flour and salt, and into the refrigerator it all goes, to rise for an hour or more.

Did my foamy-yeast-shortening-and-other-stuff concoction really rise?  I have no idea.  It looked the same as it did an hour before.  But I threw caution to the wind and proceeded.  At this point my wife had to get involved, because (as the recipe warns in capital letters), THIS IS A TWO-PERSON JOB.  Maybe a three-person.  One of you slaves over a pot of boiling oil (my wife), another gently transfers the beignets to paper towels to “oil off” (me), and the third suffocates them in powdered sugar (me again).

Handle with care!

That last sentence happens very quickly.  You can’t get the timing wrong on any step or the beignets won’t taste right.  They fry for a minute or so on each side, rest for a minute on the paper towel, and don their coat of powdered sugar with just enough oil remaining to serve as the glue.

When beignets are done correctly, they’re light and flaky.  The shortening and yeast create an air pocket inside.  But you’re not really sure if this science happens until you rescue them from the boiling oil.  Remarkably, ours really did rise.  Doused in powdered sugar they really were pretty good (then my wife mixed a little cinnamon and vanilla into the dough and they were even better).

Magnifique!

There’s a reason why beignets are so much better at the famous Cafe du Monde in New Orleans than in Dave’s kitchen.  You need to eat them as soon as they’re powdered with sugar, and wash them down with a top-shelf cup of coffee. You see, beignets, sadly, have the shortest life of any baked good I know.  If you don’t eat them warm, minutes after they’re fried, they’ll shed their light and airy consistency.  An hour later they’re as cold and chewy as day-old doughnuts at 7-Eleven.  And God forbid you leave them overnight on the counter.  The next morning you’ll have nothing but rocks.

So, you ask, were our beignets a hit at our neighbor’s game watch?  Well, let’s just say the other guests were being polite by declaring, “very good!”, especially when they ate more of our frosted sugar cookies instead (our backup dessert).  Hey, our kitchen is no Cafe du Monde.  I never said it was.  It’s the reason I’m never making étoufée.  At least I have a neighbor who will be happy to do it for me.

Some content sourced from Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

Where The Buffalo Roam

In southwestern Alberta, Canada, there’s a historical landmark curiously named “Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump”. It’s the former location of a vast communal bison trap. Thousands of years ago native hunters would drive herds of the roaming animals over the plains and then right over the adjacent cliffs, in what is described as “the single greatest food-gathering method ever developed in human history.” The buffalo aren’t running in this part of Canada anymore. They’re no longer running in Boulder, Colorado either.

In case you missed it, the American college football season kicked off last Saturday… in Dublin, Ireland.  Kansas State played Iowa State in a converted rugby stadium in front of a sell-out Guinness-filled crowd.  A roving reporter took to the streets to ask locals what they knew about the American game and the answers were wonderfully ignorant.  How many points is a touchdown? (“4?”)  Name any American college football team (“Yankees?” “Dodgers?”)  And then my favorite: What is Kansas State’s mascot? (“A tractor?”)  Not a bad answer if you ask me.  I’d guess there are more tractors than wildcats in Kansas.

Ralphie’s run

Speaking of wild things, let’s get back to Boulder.  The University of Colorado (CU) boasts one of the few live animal mascots in college football: a full-grown snortin’ stompin’ buffalo named Ralphie.  Before each half of the home games Ralphie is released from her trailer on the sidelines (yes, Ralphie is a “her”) to run a horseshoe lap around the field at full speed, before her five handlers corral her back into the trailer.  It’s the stuff of rodeos, and more than a few handlers have eaten dirt in the process (but at least they earn a varsity letter for their efforts).

Ralphie is actually the sixth live buffalo to represent CU since the mascot was selected in 1934.  But Ralphie VI – aka “Ember” – has a singular distinction.  She’s just not into the run.  Whereas her five predecessors ran for at least ten seasons each, Ember decided to call it quits after just three.  The University officially called it “indifference to running” and cut Ember from the team so she could spend the rest of her days roaming in pastures.  Maybe Ember’s thinking she’s going to go over a cliff every time she runs.  Can you blame her for hanging it up?  No word on whether Ralphie VII is up for the task.

At least CU has a ferocious mascot, one a fan would associate with the Colorado surrounds.  Like Texas’s Longhorn or Florida’s ‘Gator, you want a mascot that speaks to your particular locale and does so with a confident puff of the chest.  But instead, a lot of America’s college football mascots have you thinking either lightweight or what the heck is THAT?

Don’t mess with Texas!

Cases in point.  If I pull up this year’s top college football teams, I guarantee I’ll find several to underscore my point.  And I am right.  Ohio State’s mascot is a buckeye (which is a tree, and not a very ferocious one at that).  Georgia’s is a bulldog, described as “loyal, gentle, and affectionate”.  Oregon’s is a duck (A duck!)  Alabama is known as “the Crimson Tide”, which was a reporter’s colorful spin on a long-ago game played in the mud (and not a mascot at all).  Finally, Arizona State’s is a Sun Devil, which better belongs on Saturday morning cartoons than Saturday afternoon football fields.

On the other hand, you have the Penn State Nittany (Mountain) Lions, the Michigan Wolverines (don’t mess with wolverines), the South Carolina Gamecocks (don’t mess with those either), and the Miami Hurricanes (not an animal, but points for ferociousness and local flavor). Any one of those deserves to stand side-by-side with a live buffalo.

Notre Dame’s leprechaun

As much as I’d like leave this topic with Ember the Buffalo and her chest-thumping buddies, I sheepishly include one more: my beloved alma mater Notre Dame.  We at Notre Dame are the Fightin’ Irish, because our football teams (at least those from the early 1900s) showed “the grit, determination, and tenacity characteristic of Irish immigrants”)  That all sounds great until you see our mascot: a leprechaun who looks like he’s taking a break from the Lucky Charms cereal box.  Is there anything less ferocious and less “state of Indiana” than that?

NOW we’re talking!

If it were up to me, Notre Dame’s mascot would be an open-wheeled, open-cockpit IndyCar (VROOM! VROOM!), the kind they race every year at the Indianapolis 500 just four hours south of campus.  An IndyCar toughs out a jigging leprechaun by a mile, not to mention an indifferent buffalo who’d rather roam than run.  I still say, good on you for choosing to head out to pasture, Ember.  I wish the Notre Dame leprechaun would tag along.

Some content sourced from the Athabasca University Press article, “Imagining Head-Smashed-In”, the CUBuffs.com article, “Ralphie VI retires”, and Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.