Soft Spots

ESPN broadcast college football’s national championship Monday night. As the game moved to lopsided late in the second quarter my mind drifted to details besides the football itself. Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, FL is a striking facility, especially at night from the vantage point of the Goodyear Blimp. 15,000 football fans spaced randomly into 65,000 seats (thanks, COVID) looks awfully sparse. And speaking of awful(ly), the television commercials… well, let’s just agree college football ain’t the same thing as the Super Bowl, folks.

Home of the NFL’s Miami Dolphins

Super Bowl commercials are more entertaining than the game itself, unlike the advertisement drivel I saw Monday night.  Super Bowl plugs cost $5 million for thirty seconds while Monday night’s spots were six figures at best.  Finally, Super Bowl ads are desperate to be memorable (even if you can’t remember the product itself), which is why you have office pools for “best commercial”.  You’re not gonna have an office pool for what I watched on Monday night.  This was the reverse of the Super Bowl: great football, lousy commercials.

To say Monday night’s commercials paled in comparison to Super Bowl ads is like saying Sprite’s a little clearer than Coke.  These product pushes were awful.  For starters, you had what seemed like five advertisers over a four-hour broadcast.  Dos Equis showed up every fifteen minutes.  Their beer (excuse me, their lager) ads included a closeup of a glassful, with a commentator calling the movement of the bubbles as if they were players on a football field.  Really?  I hope his was a big paycheck.

Then you had AT&T, who seems to be promoting the lovely Milana Vayntrub (as salesperson “Lily”) as much as their products.  Perhaps they’ve watched too many Progressive Insurance ads with Stephanie Courtney (as salesperson “Flo”)?

Don’t recognize Milana? You will soon…

Finally, ESPN promoted itself.  Normally I’d harp on the host network for advertising some of its own programs even though they paid millions to broadcast the game.  But part of me thinks ESPN really does need the promos.  COVID took a big bite out of sports over the last year, as well as a big bite out of ESPN’s workforce.  When the network brought us Korean baseball and American cornhole competitions I thought, “Okay, the end is near”.

But forget ESPN because I need to be a Davey-downer (i.e., slam) on one more commercial.  I’ve been building to this moment since the first paragraph.  Gatorade just launched it’s first new beverage in twenty years: “Bolt24”.  It’s low-cal and loaded with electrolytes, so naturally the target audience is athletes.  And Gatorade also selected athletes to push its product.  Enter Serena Williams.  She’s one of those athletes I’m on the fence about.  Her athletic skills and accomplishments on the tennis court are unquestionable.  She’s garnered enough championships to earn her place in the tennis player “GOAT” discussion (greatest of all time).

But Serena also has her not-so-role-model moments.  She does not take losing well.  She does not welcome constructive criticism.  Countless broken rackets, lectures (threats?) to chair umpires, and disqualifications would have you wondering if there isn’t a permanent child lurking within the adult.  Wah wah wah.  But the Bolt24 ad was the last straw in my Serena drink.  Why?  Because the tagline goes, “you know you’ve made it when the whole world knows you by one name”.  Oh, so when I say just “Serena advertises Bolt 24”, you knowingly say in response, “oh, her?”

Yeah, I get the pitch.  Bolt24 is a one-word drink.  Serena Williams is almost the only Serena I can think of (besides Serena van der Woodsen, the entitled main character of the TV series Gossip Girl).  But I just can’t buy into the loftiness of the catchphrase.  Get the world to recognize you by first name only and “you’ve made it”?  Sting. Madonna. Cher. Bono. Enya.  See the pattern?  It’s an actor/singer thing.  Also, an athlete thing.  Lebron. Tiger. O.J. (Maybe that last one should just be “Juice”?)

Okay then, shutting down my rant now.  Holier-than-thou personas don’t deserve any more press.  I like to keep “Life in a Word” positive; simple; modest.  Like me.  You know… Dave.

Some content sourced from Wikipedia, “the free encyclopedia”.

14 thoughts on “Soft Spots

    1. If there was ever a time to give up on the NFL, Montana’s retirement might’ve been it. Hard to compare any of today’s players with Joe. The consummate player, leader, human, etc, playing for a great coach (Walsh) in a great organization (Debartolo family) We were blessed to be living in San Francisco when he won all of his rings. Then he shifted to Kansas City for his last couple of seasons and nothing felt right anymore. He should’ve retired with the 49’ers, but maybe that wasn’t an option at the time.

      Liked by 2 people

    1. If not the NFL regular season, at least watch the Super Bowl for the commercials. The ads have lagged in entertainment value the last several years but it’s always interesting to see how a company chooses to use (translation: waste) $5 million and thirty seconds of our time.

      Liked by 2 people

  1. Those AT&T commercial drive me nuts! I don’t have cable so I usually just watch Netflix/Youtube where there is minimal ads on Youtube, but when we were in MI/GA for the holidays I noticed so many awful commercials, especially the political one in GA! I hope the Super Bowl ones will bring some laughs

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I didn’t envy GA with their extra couple of months of political ads, especially right through the holidays. The Super Bowl ads have been disappointing over the last few years; not much to have an office pool about. Also not sure who their advertising agencies are but I think twice about hiring them again. Maybe they work, but I have to wonder if it really is $5 mil well spent.

    Like

  3. That was funny Dave. I have never watched a Super Bowl game, but have watched the ads the day after the Big Game. The last few years, those high-priced ads are even available a few days before. I don’t think the ads are as good as in years gone by – too modern and high tech for my taste. I’m happy to see the Budweiser draft horses – always my favorite and even the early Dorito commercials were funny, but nowadays I feel they push the envelope.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I’m with you, Linda. The Budweiser Clydesdales, and then the frogs, were some of the best Super Bowl ads ever. Doritos was always good for a laugh too. Seems to me the simpler the ad the more memorable and therefore effective it is. The last few years – they’re just weird. Maybe they’re appealing to a younger audience but I still don’t understand how they lead to more sales. Let’s hope they’re better this year. We all could use the laughs.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. If all athletes had Serena’s “I’m so much better than you” view of the world, maybe I’d cut her a break. But I can name several others who keep their accomplishments in check. This ad only bolsters what I dislike about Serena the person. She needs a super-sized helping of modesty.

      Liked by 2 people

  5. I saw somewhere that many advertisers are sitting out the Superbowl this year. Which is too bad. I don’t think anyone has topped the eTrade baby in recent years. But then I have been edging out of the relevant demographic for awhile now.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Linda Schaub Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.